Santorum 2003 : No constitutional right to privacy

Posted by Bruno On Wednesday, February 22, 2012 0 comments

  More reasons not to vote for that War Monger frothy mixture.


All the rights in the Constitution, which are individually based rights, according to our founders were not there for the individual’s gain, but the reason we established those rights was for the common good. The right to privacy is not the right to a common good. It’s a me-centered right, that obviously started in the sexual revolution with contraception and obviously quickly evolved to abortion, and now has found its way into the marriage debate. And all those acts that were self-giving acts, self-sacrificing acts, have been polluted by this right to privacy.
No right to privacy for you! i am sure Rick Santorum  then would voted yes to SOPA,ACTA and PIPA at free fall since he doesn't care about privacy  at all.  

I just cant tell  anymore if he sounds more like Orwellian or Communist! The constitutional rights we have is more geared towards the common good? More double-speak from Santorum!

Santorum is currently enjoying the spotlight, but it will not last long. His rampage against social issues are going to bite him in the backside, and he is way to extreme even for most Republicans.

If Ron Paul cannot pull in the delegates at the convention, it is a guarantee that Obama will serve another term.

And also last thoughts on this i personally find the GOP party is pathetic for letting this guy in the spotlight and suppressing Paul.

The way it sounds like the GOP doesn't want to win this election.

0 comments:

Post a Comment